自德国刑法学家费尔巴哈提出不能犯概念后,刑法理论界对不能犯是否具有可罚性、可罚性的依据以及与犯罪未遂如何区分等相关争论从未停止。日本刑法沿袭德国刑法理论,因而在不能犯问题上深受上述问题困扰,基于主客观主义视野下的学说展开充分反映了这些争论的缩影。而在日本新近的理论发展过程中,越来越多的学者意识到,围绕不能犯可罚性展开的逻辑基点归根结底在于如何贯彻因果关系这条主线,即如果能够明确一个标准来具体判断实行行为与不可能发生的结果之间是否存在刑法意义上的因果关系,那么上述诸多理论困惑便可迎刃而解。通过对日本不能犯因果关系发展脉络的全面考察,在我国刑法中应避免因主客观之争而导致的片面化结论,即应在主客观辩证统一的立场下,重视不能犯的“主观要件内容”具体建构我国不能犯因果关系的判断路径。 Since the German criminal lawyer Feuerbach made the concept can not be guilty, the theory of criminal law on whether it can be guilty of punishable, the basis of punitive and how to distinguish the crime and other related controversy has never stopped. Japanese criminal law follows the German criminal law theory and is therefore plagued by these problems on the issue of incapability. Based on the doctrine of subjectivity and objectivity, the Japanese criminal law fully reflects these miniatures. In the process of the recent development of the theory in Japan, more and more scholars realized that the logic point of starting around the penalty that can not be punished is in the final analysis how to carry out the principle of causality, that is, if we can define a standard to determine the actual behavior And the impossibility of the existence of the existence of the causal relationship between the criminal law, then many of the above theoretical puzzles can be solved. Through a comprehensive investigation of the failure of Japan to make a causal relationship, we should avoid the one-sided conclusion caused by the subjective and objective disputes in China’s criminal law. That is, we should attach importance to the subjective elements that can not be committed under the subjective and objective dialectical unity Content "Concrete construction of our country can not make causal relationship judgment path.