论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨密切值法、TOPSIS法、秩和比法3种方法评价青少年体能的价值,为建立较为科学的组合评价方法提供参考。方法收集湖南省1990—2015年12~18岁青少年的体质健康监测数据,分别采用密切值法、TOPSIS法和秩和比法对各年份不同年龄和性别的体质评价指标进行分析,并将3种方法进行组合评价。结果 3种综合评价方法的单一评价排序结果基本一致,对男生健康体能评价结果排序由高到低依次为1995,2000,2005,1985,2014,2010年,女生为2000,2005,1995,1990,2010,2014年,呈先增高后下降的趋势,但男生体能下降趋势在2014年得以遏制。结论密切值法、TOPSIS法、秩和比法3种方法的评价结果排序性基本一致,组合评价结果更加客观全面,具有较好的应用价值。
Objective To investigate the value of three methods of close value method, TOPSIS method and rank sum ratio method to evaluate adolescent physical fitness, and provide a reference for establishing a more scientific method of combined evaluation. Methods The body health monitoring data of adolescents from 12 to 18 years old from 1990 to 2015 in Hunan province were collected. The physical evaluation indexes of different ages and genders in different years were analyzed by the method of close value, TOPSIS and rank sum ratio respectively, Methods for portfolio evaluation. Results The results of single evaluation of the three comprehensive evaluation methods were basically the same. The rankings of health evaluation of boys from 1995 to 2000 were the highest in 1995, 2000, 2005, 1985, 2014 and 2010, while in 2000, 2005, 1995, 1995 and 1990, In 2010 and 2014, the trend first increased and then dropped, but the downward trend of boys’ physical fitness was stopped in 2014. Conclusion The results of the three methods of close value method, TOPSIS method and rank sum method are basically the same, and the result of combination evaluation is more objective and comprehensive and has better application value.