论文部分内容阅读
环境法学与民法学的范式整合的实质是个人主义与整体主义之间的范式对话,环境法与民法二者之间在内容上存在着很大的冲突,其原因在于民法所采取的是个人主义范式理论,而环境法所采取的是整体主义范式理论,因此二者之间自然就会存在着差异性。由于当前环境问题的突出,致使法学面临着严峻的考验,因此实现法学与民法学的对话尤为重要,与此同时环境法学与民法学自身的范式危机也是构成当前实现二者对话必要性的深层因素。基于此,本文首先阐述了环境法学与民法学产生的动因,然后对民法学与环境法学对话的可能性与必要性进行了分析,在此基础上研究了民法学与环境法学对话的目的与功能,再次对民法学与环境法学对话的内容与现状进行了探讨,最后为实现环境法学与民法学的范式整合与重构提出对策,即以“公序良俗原则”为整合与重构二者之路。
The essence of the paradigm integration between environmental law and civil law is the paradigmatic dialogue between individualism and holism. There is a great conflict in content between environmental law and civil law because civil law adopts individualism Paradigm theory, and environmental law is taken by the holism paradigm theory, so there will naturally be differences between the two. Due to the current environmental problems, which led to the legal system is facing a severe test, so the dialogue between law and civil law is particularly important. At the same time, the paradigm crisis of environmental law and civil law is also the deep factor that constitutes the necessity of the current dialogue . Based on this, this article first elaborates the motivation of environmental law and civil law, and then analyzes the possibility and necessity of the dialogue between civil law and environmental law. On the basis of this, it studies the purpose and function of civil law and environmental law dialogue , Discussing the content and current situation of civil law and environmental law dialogue again, and finally put forward some countermeasures to realize the paradigm integration and reconstruction of environmental law and civil law, that is, to integrate and reconstruct the principle of public order and vulgarity road.