从“精神”梳释考朱陆之辨——以陈建《学蔀通辨》为例展开

来源 :孔子研究 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:getold
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
陈建《学蔀通辨》设专编批驳陆九渊及其后学以至王阳明之学为一部部禅学,认为“作弄精神”、“识心见性”是诸学为禅学抑或近禅之共性。在陈建问题视域之意义上,陆、王隐然成为一共“禅”性之“心学”学派。“精神”一词的意蕴成为陈建批驳陆、王诸学之一大关节,然事实上亦成为衡定陈建立论得失的一重要关节。仅就“精神”意蕴之于陈建、朱子,较之陆学以至王学则皆似同而异趣,甚而涉及儒释道之异旨。 Chen Jian, “Xue Tong Tong Dian” set up a special edit criticism of Lu Jiuyuan and Wang Yangming and his later studies as a department of Zen, that “make fun of spirit”, “insightfulness” is Zhu Xue for Zen or near Zen commonality. In the sense of the issue of Chen Jian’s problem, Lu and Wang Yinran became the “heart and soul” schools of “Zen”. The meaning of the word “spirit” has become one of the major joints of Chen Jian’s criticism of Lu and Wang Zhu Xue. In fact, it has also become an important joint measure of Chen Jianli’s success and failure. Only “spirit ” Implication of Chen Jian, Zhu Zi, compared with Lu Xue and Wang Xue are similar and different interest, even involving the different purposes of Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism.
其他文献
<正>新一代的领导者所遭遇的挑战,会与之前的领导者有着根本的不同,其中最大的不同,不是环境的改变,也不是技术的改变,而是企业发展的逻辑改变了。这需要领导者真正做出引领