论文部分内容阅读
宅基地使用权退出是宅基地制度改革的重要尝试。政府主导型宅基地使用权退出实践已显现出某些不足,主张直接入市的农民自主型退出论置于现有法律体系存在解释困境,即使该论成立,也不能否认宅基地使用权社区合作型退出的正当性。宅基地使用权退出的社区化机制以维护农村土地集体所有制为底线,充实农民集体经济组织的所有权、经营权和管理权,农户和所在集体经济组织合作互助进行宅基地使用权退出实践。宅基地使用权退出的社区化机制包括退回制度和转化制度,退出制度是法律调整退回关系的表现,包括退回原则、退回过程、干预机制等;转化制度是法律调整转化关系的表现,包括转化措施、转化法律效果、转化配套机制等。
The withdrawal of the right to use homestead is an important attempt to reform the system of housing sites. The practice of withdrawing the right to use government-owned housing sites has shown some deficiencies. It is argued that there is an explanation for the existing legal system of peasant-dependent withdrawal from direct entry into the market. Even if the theory is established, it can not be denied the right to use community-based cooperatives Exit the legitimacy. The community-based mechanism for the retirement of the right to use homestead bases the collective ownership of rural land on the bottom line, enriching the ownership, management and management rights of peasant collective economic organizations, and peasant households and the collective economic organizations they work in support of their retirement of their land use rights. The community-based mechanisms for the retirement of the right to use homestead include the system of return and the system of conversion. The system of withdrawal is the reflection of the lawful return of the law, including the principle of return, the process of return, and the mechanism of intervention. The system of transformation is a manifestation of the relationship between legal adjustment and conversion, , Conversion of legal effects, transformation of supporting mechanisms.