开拓,从来都需要对所走过的道路加以总结;发展,更需要认真对自己的历史加以反省。20世纪的学术,对于今天的人们来说,毫无疑问应该好好地总结。与中国传统的史学遗产相比,中国的马克思主义史学无疑具有前者所不具备的显明特色。对于中华人民共和国成立后至“文化大革命”前这十七年的马克思主义史学,正如有的论者所言,“在全国范围内(不包括港、澳、台)确立了主导地位,既取得了许多成就,又发生了重 Development, we must always be summing up the road traveled; development, but also need to seriously reflect on their own history. Twentieth-century scholarship, no doubt for today’s people, should be well summarized. Compared with China’s traditional historical heritage, Marxist historiography in China undoubtedly has the obvious features that the former does not have. For the seventeen-year-old Marxist historiography after the founding of the People’s Republic of China until the ”Great Cultural Revolution,“ as some commentators have said, ”dominating the entire nation (excluding Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan) , Many accomplishments have taken place and heavy reoccurrence has taken place