经济生活中,由于瑕疵票据引发的纠纷时有发生,一个突出问题是如何界定这些带有瑕疵的票据的效力,基本观点是,不能简单地一概予以否定,科学的态度应是区别对待,以主客观标准及当事人对票据的控制能力为标准,进行划分,具有控制能力而未能有效控制的,可以按无效票据处理,相反对票据不具有控制能力的,可以认定为有效票据,以避免使其承担较重风险责任。瑕疵票据效力的判定,其结果直接导致相关当事人风险责任的承担,关系该票据的命运,也间接影响着票据在经济生活中的流通和使用。 In the economic life, the disputes that are caused by the defective paper sometimes occur. A prominent issue is how to define the validity of these defective paper. The basic idea is that we should not simply deny it. The scientific attitude should be treated differently. Objective criteria and the party’s ability to control the notes as a standard, divided, with control but can not effectively control, you can press the invalid bills, on the contrary, the bills do not have the ability to control, can be identified as valid bills to avoid making it Bear heavier risk responsibility. The determination of the validity of a defective instrument results in a direct bearing on the risk responsibility of the relevant parties, and the fate of the instrument also indirectly influences the circulation and use of the instrument in economic life.