物权请求权虽源于物权但有别于物权,其性质属于请求权的分支,是物权的权能之一,应有相对的独立性,故有适用诉讼时效的余地。同时动产返还请求权会因权利人的长期不行使而使他人产生外观的信赖,故有适用诉讼时效的必要。诉讼时效制度对于物权请求权的适用问题在我国的现行立法中尚无定论,应通过立法或司法解释加以明确。 Although the claim of real right comes from the real right but is different from the real right, its nature belongs to the branch of the right of claim. It is one of the powers of the real right and should be relatively independent. Therefore, there is room for applying the limitation of action. At the same time, the request for the right to return of movable property will cause the appearance trust of others due to the prolonged non-exercise by the obligee, so it is necessary to apply the limitation of action. The application of the limitation of action system to the claim of real right is not conclusive in the current legislation of our country and should be clarified through legislation or judicial interpretation.