我是一个基层药学工作者,看了本刊1979年第1期关于“药学界座谈药学教育改革问题”的通讯,颇受启发,现结合自身的感受,谈点个人的看法。总的看来,三十年来我国药学教育的状况是好的,但在相当一些方面确也存在不少问题。除了林彪、“四人帮”十余年来的严重干扰和破坏外,很大程度上还在于我们工作中存在着问题,例如管理体制、院系布局、专业划分、课程设置,毕业分配、单位用人等等方面。这里仅谈谈专业划分和课程设置。关于专业划分,药学专业大致可分为三类,即制药类、药学类和中药类。对于制药类的专业设置,是否可在原化学制药、 I am a grassroots pharmacy worker. I read the first issue of 1979, “Pharmacy Seminar on Pharmacy Education Reform,” and was inspired by my own feelings and personal opinions. In general, the status of pharmacy education in our country has been good for three decades, but quite a few problems do exist in quite a few aspects. Apart from the grave interference and sabotage of Lin Biao and the “gang of four” for more than a decade, there are still a great number of problems in our work such as the management system, the layout of faculties, the division of professions, the setting of courses, the distribution of graduates, the units Employer and so on. Here only talk about the professional division and curriculum. On the professional division, pharmacy can be broadly divided into three categories, namely pharmaceuticals, pharmaceuticals and traditional Chinese medicine. For the pharmaceutical professional settings, whether in the original chemical pharmaceutical,