论文部分内容阅读
2014年6月23日,最高人民法院发布了指导案例31号《江苏炜伦航运股份有限公司诉米拉达玫瑰公司船舶碰撞损害赔偿纠纷案》。为了正确理解和准确参照适用该指导性案例,现对其推选经过、裁判要点、需要说明的问题等予以解释、论证和说明。一、推选过程及其指导意义该指导性案例由上海海事法院报送上海市高级人民法院,经上海市高级人民法院审判委员会讨论决定,将其向最高人民法院案例指导工作办公室推荐。案例指导
On June 23, 2014, the Supreme People’s Court issued Guiding Case No.31 “Dispute over Ship Damage Compensation of Jiangsu Wei Lun Shipping Co., Ltd. v. Miranda Rose Co., Ltd.”. In order to correctly understand and accurately refer to the application of the guiding case, it is now explained, justified and explained on the basis of its selection, points of referees and issues to be explained. First, the selection process and its guiding significance The guiding case submitted by the Shanghai Maritime Court to the Shanghai Higher People’s Court, the Shanghai Higher People’s Court trial committee to discuss the decision to the Supreme People’s Court case guidance office recommended. Case guidance