论文部分内容阅读
对官员的政绩用数字来进行考核,这在各级行政机关里屡见不鲜,从经济发展模式上,是以GDP作为主要的指标。全国政协委员、上海市心血管病研究所所长葛均波认为,这是一种懒政,一些荒唐的数字绩效严重影响到政府行政的公信力。他建议,行政管理的考核方法需科学设定:去除不合理的指标考核,如果需要用数字衡量,需要由专家设计制定合理的考核办法,并交政府主管部门审批,必要的交由各级人民代表大会和政协会议讨论,并吸取合理的意见建议。同时,针对具体的行
The official performance of officials with numerical assessment, which is not uncommon in all levels of government agencies, from the economic development model, GDP is the main indicator. Ge Junbo, a member of the CPPCC National Committee and director of the Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, believes this is a kind of lazy regime and some ridiculous digital performance seriously affects the credibility of government administration. He suggested that the administrative examination methods need to be scientifically set: to remove unreasonable indicators of assessment, if you need to use digital measurement, experts need to develop a reasonable assessment methods and submitted to the competent authorities for approval, the necessary people at all levels Congress and CPPCC meetings to discuss and draw a reasonable opinion. At the same time, specific lines