论文部分内容阅读
为了解我国眼科学期刊学术影响力的现状和发展趋势,对2006～2010年《中国科技期刊引证报告》收录的10种眼科学期刊的文献计量学评价指标进行统计分析,并采用学术影响力评估模型进行学术影响力评估,研究结果显示,我国10种眼科学期刊的学术影响力发展趋势呈5种形式:①期刊学术影响力高,但增长率为负值或较低,如《中华眼科杂志》、《眼科新进展》和《中国实用眼科杂志》的学术影响力位居前3位,但增长率为负值或较低;②期刊学术影响力较低,增长率较高,如《中国斜视与小儿眼科杂志》和《临床眼科杂志》的学术影响力低,但增长率较高,说明近5年发展较好;③期刊学术影响力较高,增长率也较高,如《眼科研究》和《中华眼底病杂志》的学术影响力分别位居第4位、第5位,增长率分别位居第2位、第5位,显示这2种期刊近年发展稳步前进;④期刊学术影响力和增长率均较低,如《眼科》和《眼视光学杂志》,均有待进一步提高学术影响力;⑤期刊学术影响力和增长率均位居中上水平的《眼外伤职业眼病杂志》。通过本研究,希望可以对我国眼科学期刊的评价和各个期刊的进一步发展提供一定的参考依据。
To understand the status quo and development trend of the academic influence of ophthalmological journals in our country, statistical analysis was made on the bibliometrics evaluation indexes of 10 kinds of ophthalmology journals included in the Citation Report of Chinese Sci-tech Periodicals from 2006 to 2010. The academic influence was evaluated Model of academic influence assessment, the results show that 10 kinds of ophthalmology journals of academic influence in the development trend of five forms: ① journals academic influence, but the growth rate is negative or low, such as “Journal of Ophthalmology ”,“ New advances in ophthalmology ”and“ Chinese Journal of Practical Ophthalmology ”top three academic influence, but the growth rate is negative or lower; ② journals academic influence is lower, higher growth rates, such as“ China Journal of Strabismus and Pediatric Ophthalmology ”and“ Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology ”academic influence is low, but the high rate of growth shows that the development of the past 5 years is better; ③ periodical academic influence is higher, the growth rate is also higher, such as“ Eye Research ”And“ Journal of Fundus Diseases ”academic rank fourth, fifth place, respectively, the growth rate ranked second place, No. 5, indicating that these two journals in recent years the development of steady progress; ④ Journal academic influence force Growth rates are lower, such as “Ophthalmology” and “Optometry magazine”, are to be further improved academic influence; ⑤ Academy Impact and growth rates are among the levels of “Ocular Trauma and Occupational Eye Disease.” Through this study, I hope to provide some reference for the evaluation of our ophthalmology journals and the further development of each periodical.