论文部分内容阅读
美国联邦第九巡回上诉法院于1992年创设了商标指示性合理使用原则。近来,该法院判决了一起在域名中使用他人商标的侵权案件,认定被告的指示性合理使用抗辩成立,未侵犯原告的商标权。本文试从案件事实出发,结合本案争议焦点,全面展示法院在该案中的推理分析过程。并在此基础上,讨论在域名中商标指示性合理使用的判断方法。这对于构建我国的商标合理使用制度和商标法的第三次修改大有裨益。
In 1992, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals of the United States created the principle of indicative and fair use of trademarks. Recently, the court ruled that an infringement case involving the use of a trademark of another person in a domain name was found, and the defendant’s counter-use of the counterfeit trademark was found to have infringed the plaintiff’s trademark rights. This article tries to proceed from the facts of the case, with the focus of the case controversy, a comprehensive demonstration of the court in the case of reasoning analysis process. And on this basis, to discuss the judgments on the indicative and reasonable use of trademarks in domain names. This is of great benefit to the construction of China’s trademark fair use system and the third revision of the Trademark Law.