我们在执行公共场所卫生标准的过程中,发现有不妥之处,特别是“4、5、6级旅店招待所卫生标准”中的风速。现结合3年来的监测结果,加以讨论。1 关于监测方法《公共场所卫生监督监测要点》中规定旅店业监测时关门,但对是否关窗未做具体规定。开窗与关窗其风速测定结果有较大差异,而且都不能完全反映室内风速的实际变化情况。在北方冬、春、秋季窗户多处于关闭状态,在夏季窗户多是昼开夜关,而开窗时室内风速随室外风速大小及窗户开启程度变化而变化。因此,在北方,关窗监测较妥当。 During the implementation of hygiene standards in public places, we found that there were some discrepancies, especially the wind speed in the Health Standards for Rooms 4, 5 and 6 Hospitality Inns. Now combined with the monitoring results over the past three years, to be discussed. 1 on the monitoring method “public health monitoring points” in the hotel industry when monitoring closed, but whether the window is not specified. The results of wind speed measurement between window opening and window closing are quite different, and all of them can not fully reflect the actual change of indoor wind speed. In the northern winter, spring and autumn, the windows are mostly closed. In the summer, the windows mostly open at night and turn on at night, while the indoor wind speed changes with the outdoor wind speed and the window opening degree when the window is opened. Therefore, in the north, window monitoring is appropriate.