论文部分内容阅读
目的了解健康干预对农村生态卫生设施应用效果的影响。方法在广西龙胜、南丹、隆安、贵港等地随机选择已建造生态卫生设施(粪尿分集式生态卫生厕所)但未开展健康干预的农户,分为干预组和对照组,对干预组开展为期一年的健康干预,对照组则不采取任何干预措施,干预结束后对其进行调查。结果经过干预后的农民对各相关知识的知晓率明显高于对照组的农民,差异有统计学意义;干预组和对照组对生态卫生设施使用率分别为95.5%和72.0%,其中正确使用率分别为92.9%和45.0%,清洁程度好的厕所所占比例分别为92.9%和45.0%,清洁程度中的厕所所占比例分别为2.6%和15.0%,农户的满意率分别为92.0%和45.0%,差异均有统计学意义。结论健康干预能有效提高农民相关知识水平和生态卫生设施的正确使用率、满意率,使生态卫生设施能更好发挥其综合效益,适宜在农村改厕中推广应用。
Objective To understand the effect of health intervention on the application effect of rural ecological sanitation facilities. Methods Farmers who had built ecological sanitation facilities (excreta-urine diversity sanitation latrines) but did not carry out health interventions were randomly selected in Longsheng, Nandan, Long’an, Guigang and other places in Guangxi. The households were divided into intervention group and control group, The one-year health intervention, the control group did not take any interventions, after the intervention to investigate. Results The farmers’ awareness rate of all relevant knowledge after the intervention was significantly higher than that of the control group farmers, the difference was statistically significant; the utilization rates of the ecological sanitation facilities in the intervention group and the control group were 95.5% and 72.0% respectively, of which the correct utilization rate Respectively, 92.9% and 45.0% respectively. The proportion of toilets with good cleanliness was 92.9% and 45.0% respectively. The proportion of toilets in cleanliness was 2.6% and 15.0% respectively. The satisfaction rate of farmers was 92.0% and 45.0% respectively %, The differences were statistically significant. Conclusion Health intervention can effectively improve the farmers’ knowledge level and the correct use rate and satisfaction rate of ecological sanitation facilities so that ecological sanitation facilities can better exert their comprehensive benefits and be suitable for popularization and application in rural toilets.