论文部分内容阅读
1994年5月深圳国际房地产咨询服务有限公司贵阳公司(以下简称深房公司)在开发修建商品房中因拆除一祖遗房屋涉讼。该案经贵阳中院一审判决后,深房公司不服,以原审原告被告之间不属损害与被损害问题,应属拆迁安置问题为由,提出上诉。省院二审此案,查明:1993年8月,深房公司经贵阳市政府批准,并办理了规划、土地手续,在贵阳市嘉禾路地段修建商品房。在该地段,有一座落于嘉禾路35号、面积为109平方米的李姓祖遗房屋。1992年6月,李姓房主将该房租赁给贵阳市云延消毒服分公司,当时双方签
May 1994 Shenzhen International Real Estate Consulting Services Co., Ltd. Guiyang company (hereinafter referred to as the deep-house company) in the development and construction of commercial housing due to removal of ancestor legacy housing litigation. After the first instance verdict of Guiyang Intermediate People’s Court, Shenzhen Fangfang Company refused to accept the case and the original plaintiff defendant was not a victim of damage and damage. Therefore, the case should be an issue of demolition and resettlement and an appeal should be filed. The second case of the provincial court found: In August 1993, the company approved by the Guiyang municipal government, and handled the planning, land procedures, construction of commercial housing in Jiahe Road, Guiyang. In the lot, there is a No. 35 Jiahe Road, an area of 109 square meters of Li Zixu left housing. June 1992, Lee surnamed the owner of the room will be leased to Guiyang City, Yun Yan disinfection service branch, both parties signed