【裁判要旨】提供在线网络游戏的服务商经核准注册的商标,含有相关公众约定俗称的一类游戏名称的,如果他人不是将该游戏名称作为区分商品或者服务来源的商标使用,只是在网络游戏服务中以介绍游戏内容、特点的方式使用该游戏名称,不会造成相关公众对网络游戏服务提供者的混淆,属于对注册商标的正当使用,不构成对注册商标专用权的侵犯。案例刊载于《最高人民法院公报》2011年第12期 The purpose of the referee to provide online online game service providers registered trademarks, including the relevant general public agreed to a class of game name, if the other is not the name of the game as a distinction between the source of goods or services, trademarks, but in online games Service to introduce the game content, characteristics of the way to use the name of the game will not cause the public to online game service providers confusion, is a legitimate use of registered trademarks, does not constitute a violation of the exclusive right to use registered trademarks. The case was published in the Bulletin of the Supreme People’s Court No.12 in 2011