论文部分内容阅读
这里全文转发去年12月4日《文艺报》登载的一组与我刊有关的文章。一篇文章批评一家或几家刊物,原本是极正常的,毫不足怪。值得注意的是,正如《文艺报》编者按语中所指出的两点:第一,我们需要怎样的艺术批评?我们应该进行怎样的批评?怎样才能建立良好的批评氛围和风气?这关乎到批评者的出发点、心态以及他们的文风和学风。第二,美术专业期刊应该怎么办?期刊“断奶”后,生路何在?两个问题不仅有待于认真的思考与讨论。而且最终要靠实践来回答。在此,我们仅对《文艺报》编者和楚炬先生、张仃先生、杨悦浦先生观察问题的敏锐与明朗见解表示赞赏和钦佩。
The full text here is forwarded on December 4 last year, a group of articles published in the “literary arts” published with my magazine. An article criticizing one or several publications, was originally very normal, not surprising. It is noteworthy that, as the Editor of the Arts and Literature editorial pointed out in his speech, there are two points: First, what kind of artistic criticism do we need? What kind of criticism should we make? How can we establish a good atmosphere and atmosphere of criticism? The starting point, attitude and their style of writing and style of study. Second, art journals should be how to do? Journal “weaning”, where is the road? Two issues not only to be serious thinking and discussion. And ultimately, it must be answered by practice. Here, we only express our appreciation and admiration for the keen and bright opinions of the editors of the Arts and Literature and Mr. Chu Ju, Mr. Zhang Ding and Mr. Yang Yuepu on the observation of the issue.