论文部分内容阅读
2013年8月我收到了一起医疗纠纷案件,患者为近百岁的离休老干部,参加过抗战时的多次战斗,解放后担任过政府的重要领导职务,在被告医院就诊后因多种原因导致最终病逝,其继承人将被告医院诉至法院,请求赔偿各种损失共计60余万元。2015年新年伊始,该案历经一年半的审理、十几次的谈话和庭审、多次鉴定、调查取证、数不清的电话沟通,最终以判决的方式审结,判后双方均未上诉。案子虽然已经画上了一个比较圆满的句号,但庭审中原告、被告双方对医学知识和法律观
In August 2013, I received a medical dispute involving a veteran retired cadres nearly a hundred years of age who participated in many battles during the war. After liberation, she served as an important government leadership. After the defendant was hospitalized for a number of reasons Eventually died, the heir to the defendant hospital sued the court, requesting compensation for a total of more than 60 million loss. At the beginning of the new year from 2015, after a year and a half of hearings, dozens of interviews and hearings, several appraisals, investigation and evidence collection, innumerable phone conversations, the case was eventually adjudicated by verdict. Both parties did not appeal. Although the case has been painted a more complete period, but the trial plaintiff, the defendants on both medical knowledge and legal concept