论文部分内容阅读
现代社会不仅存在各种环境污染,高科技也会带来大小不同的环境风险。与事后型的损害赔偿制度不同,环境侵权诉讼禁令制度能够事前有效预防并抑制环境污染、生态破坏的发生。不过,该项制度在我国司法实践与理论研究中均面临着法理与构造上的困境。基于实证分析和比较研究,可在编纂民法典过程中把禁令制度纳入人格权法部分,与现行侵权责任法法理及规范相互协调,共同构建适合我国的二元救济机制,特别是违法性判断基准的区别保护制度。
In modern society, not only various kinds of environmental pollution exist, but also high-tech industries bring different environmental risks of different sizes. Unlike the latter type of damages system, the ban on environmental tort litigation can effectively prevent and suppress the occurrence of environmental pollution and ecological damage in advance. However, this system is facing legal and structural difficulties in the judicial practice and theoretical research of our country. Based on the empirical analysis and comparative study, the prohibition system can be included in the part of personality right law in the process of compiling the civil code, which is coordinated with the current jurisprudence and norms of the law of tort liability to jointly build a binary relief mechanism suitable for our country, especially the judgment basis of illegality The difference between the protection system.