翻阅了1960年《山花》刊载的文艺评论,我觉得有许多好文章,它们对我省文艺创作,无疑会起到推动作用。但是也有一些文章似手有这样一种倾向,就是:文章开头总是以较大的篇幅复述作品的内容或故事情节;当中加上一段对作品的肯定,而肯定也多在思想性一面,忽略艺术性一面;最后空空洞洞说几条缺点。我认为,象这样的评论文章,实际上只起到一个介绍作品内容的作用。当然为了说明评论者的观点和看法,介绍一下内容或故事情节,有时虽然也需要,但是却不应成为 Reading through the literary and art commentary published in “Mountain Flowers” in 1960, I think there are many good articles that undoubtedly play a catalytic role in literary and artistic creation in our province. However, there are also some articles that seem to have such a tendency that the article always reproduces the content or the story of the work with a large space at its beginning. Adding a period of affirmation to the work, it definitely affirms the ideological side and neglects the artistic Side; the last empty hole that several shortcomings. In my opinion, a commentary like this actually only plays a part in introducing the content of the work. Of course, in order to explain the views and opinions of commentators, it is necessary to introduce contents or storyline sometimes, but not necessarily