论文部分内容阅读
在集体土地所有权客体范围的界定上存在集体土地所有权客体的宏观范围界定问题与集体土地所有权客体的微观范围界定问题。集体土地有权客体宏观范围的确定应遵循历史延续原则,并彻底贯彻《宪法》所确立的农村与城市郊区范围内集体土地所有权推定原则。在集体土地所有权客体微观范围界定上,历史上形成的村集体所有、村内集体(村民小组)所有与乡(镇)集体所有之间的界分应当继续坚持与明确,农村土地所有权在历史演进中形成的集体支配边界应当继续维护。
In the definition of the scope of the object of collective land ownership, there exists the problem of defining the macroscopic scope of the object of collective land ownership and the micro-scope of the object of collective land ownership. The determination of the macroscopic scope of the object’s rights of collective land should follow the principle of historical continuation and thoroughly implement the principle of presumption of collective land ownership within the rural areas and urban suburbs established by the Constitution. On the definition of the microcosmic scope of the object of collective land ownership, the boundary between all the village collectives formed in history, all the collectives within the village (village group) and the collective ownership of the township (town) should be persisted and clearly defined. In the historical evolution of rural land ownership The formed collective dominance boundary should continue to be maintained.