读了王杏根同志的《鲁迅<中国地质略论>作意辨证》一文①后,觉得有几点可议之处。一是史料运用。拙文《<中国地质略论>的写作与中国近代史上的护矿斗争》一文②引证了日本大阪《朝日新闻》上的一条消息,认为它与《略论》的写作“直接相关”,王杏根同志对此表示“怀疑”。据他说:“促使鲁迅以沙俄夺我矿权事实警策国人的”,“并非由于《朝日新闻》上的有关消息”,而是在此之前八个月《浙江潮》第一期所刊登而为我所“疏忽”了的《要索纷来》。事实是否如此呢?不妨作一比较。 After reading Comrade Wang Xinggen’s article entitled “Syndrome Differentiation of Syndrome” written by Lu Xun, China Geology, do you think there are some suggestions? First, the use of historical data. I cite a piece of paper from Asahi Shimbun in Osaka, Japan, that “it is directly related to the writing” on “sketch,” comrade Wang Xinggen That “doubt.” According to him: “It is not for” Asahi Shimbun “that” it is not because of the relevant news on Asahi Shimbun, but for the first phase of the Zhejiang tide eight months prior to that, For my “negligence” of the “want to ask for trouble.” Is this true? For comparison.