论文部分内容阅读
关于秦建都千的最早记载是《括地志》引《帝王世纪》云;“秦襄公二年,徒都千。”对于这一点,有些学者持否定意见,笔者认为徙都千是成立的。首先我们先要分析一下反对者的论据。祝忠熹先生认为:《史记》不仅没有襄公迁千的记载,而且多处强调襄公居西垂,葬西垂;即使其子文公,即位后也“居西垂宫”。我们看不出襄公曾经迁都的任何迹
The earliest recorded records of the Qin Dynasty’s establishment of the “Centennial Records” refer to the “imperial century” cloud; “For two years, both the public and the public were members of the Qin Dynasty.” For this reason, some scholars hold negative opinions. In my opinion, established. First, let us analyze the arguments of the opponents. Zhu Zhongxi said: “Historical Records” not only failed to record the relocation of thousands of people, but also stressed that many places Xianggongju West, buried down; even if the son of public, ascended the throne We can not see any traces of Xianggong’s relocation of the capital