论文部分内容阅读
一、案例引入“山东鲁锦实业有限公司诉鄄城县鲁锦工艺品有限责任公司、济宋礼之邦家纺有限公司侵犯商标专用权及不正当竞争纠纷上诉案”[1]被评为2009年中国知识产权司法保护十大案件之一,是因为本案中法院确定了具有地域性特点的商品通用名称的广泛性特征的认定。法院认为,司法操作中,对于广泛性来认定,不应以是否在全国范围内广泛性的认定,应以特定产区及相关公众的接受程度为标准,而不应以是
First, the introduction of the case “Shandong Lujin Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Juancheng County, Lu Jin handicrafts limited liability company, Ji Songli State Textile Co., Ltd. infringement of trademark rights and unfair competition dispute appeals ” [1] was named 2009 One of the top 10 cases on the judicial protection of intellectual property in China is the determination of the broad features of the generic name of a product with regional characteristics in this case. The court held that judicatory operation should not be based on universality and should not be widely recognized across the country. It should be based on the acceptability of a particular producing area and the public concerned, and should not be based on