论文部分内容阅读
目的对国内尘肺病治疗药物的临床疗效进行研究。方法在本院2015年1月至2016年12月所收治的尘肺病患者中盲选70例,均分为观察组35例,对照组35例,采用不同药物治疗。对两组用药方案的治疗效果进行比较。结果观察组在本次治疗中总有效率为91.43%(32/35),对照组为94.28%(33/35),无明显差异,P>0.05无统计学意义。观察组治愈用时为(7.84±1.54)d,对照组为(8.42±1.98),观察组用时少于对照组,P>0.05差异具备统计学意义。治疗期间观察组5例出现不良反应,对照组为4例,P>0.05差异具备统计学意义。结论我国西医、中医药物治疗尘肺病均已较为成熟,临床疗效均较为显著。
Objective To study the clinical efficacy of domestic pneumoconiosis drugs. Methods Seventy patients with pneumoconiosis who were admitted to our hospital from January 2015 to December 2016 were selected blindly and divided into observation group (35 cases) and control group (35 cases) with different drugs. The treatment effect of the two groups were compared. Results The total effective rate of the observation group was 91.43% (32/35) in the treatment group and 94.28% (33/35) in the control group, with no significant difference, P> 0.05 was not statistically significant. The observation group was cured (7.84 ± 1.54) d, the control group (8.42 ± 1.98), the observation group was less than the control group, P> 0.05 difference was statistically significant. During the treatment, 5 patients in the observation group had adverse reactions, while 4 patients in the control group, P> 0.05 had statistical significance. Conclusion Western medicine and Chinese medicine treatment of pneumoconiosis have been more mature, the clinical efficacy were more significant.