论文部分内容阅读
2005年,最高人民法院发布了《二五改革纲要》,明确提出建立和完善案例指导制度。鉴于案例指导制度具有弥补立法的不足,制约自由裁量权,促进司法和执法统一的作用,各级政府部门纷纷效仿,在本辖区内积极探索建立案例指导制度,指导本部门的行政执法工作。然而,各地建立的案例指导制度存在不统一、不规范的现象,因此探讨行政指导性案例概念、名称、效力、发布主体等问题,具有重要意义。
In 2005, the Supreme People’s Court promulgated the “Outline of the 25th Five-Year Plan,” and clearly proposed the establishment and improvement of the case guidance system. Given that the case guidance system has the functions of making up for the lack of legislation, restricting discretion and promoting the unity of judiciary and law enforcement, government departments at all levels have followed suit and actively explored the establishment of a case guidance system in their jurisdictions to guide their administrative law enforcement. However, there are some unification and non-standard case guidance systems established in various places. Therefore, it is of great significance to discuss the concept, name, effectiveness and main body of the administrative guidance cases.