目的探讨赖氨匹林经静脉注射和肌内注射两种不同的给药途径,对高热患者降温的疗效。方法选择发热门诊高热患者160例,随机分为静脉注射组和肌内注射组。每组80例,分别在应用赖氨匹林30、60、90、120min后进行降温疗效的比较。结果用药后90min,静脉注射和肌内注射组分别有1.25%和2.5%的患者体温反而上升,有31.25%和40%的患者体温下降,但未降至正常,有67.5%和57%的患者体温降至正常。结论赖氨匹林静脉注射和肌内注射退热效果都较理想。 Objective To study the curative effect of the two different routes of administration of meticlopidine intravenous injection and intramuscular injection on patients with hyperthermia. Methods 160 patients with hyperthermia in fever clinic were randomly divided into intravenous injection group and intramuscular injection group. Each group of 80 cases, respectively, after the application of 30, 60, 90, 120min after the application of aspirin cooling effect comparison. Results At 90 minutes after treatment, the body temperature of patients receiving intravenous injection and intramuscular injection increased by 1.25% and 2.5%, respectively. The body temperature decreased in 31.25% and 40% of the patients, but not in normal, 67.5% and 57% of the patients Body temperature dropped to normal. Conclusion The effects of intravenous injection of aspirin and intramuscular injection of antipyretic are satisfactory.