论文部分内容阅读
诞生于20世纪20年代的芝加哥学派城市社会学,对美国城市政策的制定和城市史学的发展产生了巨大影响。在其影响下,联邦住房管理局的购买、维修住房贷款向郊区纯白人居住区倾斜;城市研究则形成了郊区富裕、城市贫困、郊区化主要是白人中产阶级在交通技术进步的带动下来到郊区的叙事模式,并将这一叙事上溯至郊区诞生之初。20世纪90年代以来的新郊区史研究,认为之前的郊区史叙事忽略了第二次世界大战前郊区化中的下层群体及与之相关的工业分散、郊区下层住房市场、工人在郊区的生活及政治诉求等方面,同心圆理论不能准确反映芝加哥自身的历史。城市史和芝加哥学派城市社会学的关系经历了深受其影响到与之渐行渐远、再到彻底反思的过程。
The sociology of Chicago School, born in the 1920s, had a tremendous impact on the formulation of U.S. urban policies and the development of urban historiography. Under its influence, the Federal Housing Administration’s purchase and maintenance of housing loans to suburban white residential areas tilt; urban research has formed a wealthy suburbs, urban poverty, suburbanization is mainly the white middle class in the transport technology progress down to the suburbs Narrative mode, and this narrative dating back to the birth of the suburbs. The study of the new suburban history since the 1990s shows that the former narratives of the suburbs ignored the lower groups in the suburbs prior to the Second World War and the related industrial dispersal, the suburbial housing market, the lives of workers in the suburbs and Political appeal and other aspects, the theory of concentric circles can not accurately reflect the history of Chicago itself. The relationship between urban history and the Chicago School sociology has undergone a process that has been deeply influenced by it and has gone backwards and then thoroughly rethought.