论文部分内容阅读
社会矛盾解决是一个伴随着社会主义现代化进程并适应着国家治理体系现代化要求的演进过程。在国家治理体系和治理能力现代化进程中,社会矛盾解决机制始终随着国家政策导向与社会内生格局的变化进行适应性调整。当前,我国进入到战略机遇期与矛盾凸显期并存的发展阶段,更为复杂的社会利益结构体系和社会矛盾纠纷类型相继出现,不同地区的社会矛盾解决机制也呈现出截然不同的状况和效果:有些地区将社会矛盾纠纷解决锁定于政府行政权力对社会资源的操控,传统的维稳观念与现代治理理念大相径庭;相当多数地区积极为社会矛盾纠纷解决赋予了更多的治理内蕴,在资源配置、利益分配、发展目标等层面表现出共建共治的新特征。近年来全国各地所涌现出的一批典型经验和模式,表明政社互动业已成为社会治理的突破口和关键。下一步,中国社会矛盾纠纷化解机制的建构应以政社互动为导向,紧扣政府治理和社会调节、居民自治良性互动的改革目标,实现政府有限干预与社会合作共治的有机衔接,推进政府赋权转能与社会自我治理的协同发展,促进政府解纷息争与社会理性维权的规则之治。
Social conflict resolution is an evolutionary process that accompanies the process of socialist modernization and meets the requirements of the modernization of the state governing system. In the process of national governance and the modernization of governance capacity, the mechanism for resolving social conflicts has always been adaptively adjusted with the changes in the orientation of national policies and the pattern of social endogenousities. At present, our country has entered a stage of development in which both strategic opportunities and contradictions have been highlighted. More complicated social interest structures and types of social conflicts and disputes have emerged one after another. The mechanisms for resolving social conflicts in different regions have also shown quite different conditions and effects: In some areas, the solution to social conflicts and conflicts is locked in the administrative power of the government to control the social resources. The traditional concept of stability and stability is very different from the concept of modern governance. In quite a few areas, more governance connotations are given to solving social conflicts and disputes, Profit distribution, development goals and other aspects of the new characteristics of co-governance. In recent years, a series of typical experiences and models emerging from all over the country have shown that the interaction between government and government has become the breakthrough and the key to social governance. In the next step, the construction of the mechanism for resolving social conflicts and disputes in China should be guided by the interaction between government and social sciences, and be closely linked to the goals of the government that are governed by government and social regulation and the positive interaction of residents’ self-government, and achieve the organic convergence of limited government intervention and social co-governance, To coordinate the development of empowerment and social self-governance and to promote the governance of disputes over government disputes and social rationality.