论文部分内容阅读
作者改勤的这篇文章谈到,采用《中国档案分类法》(以下简称《分类法》)的类目体系进行文书立卷的试验(西安市民政局)结果证明,不但可行,而且方法简单。 传统的立卷方式:是对一个全宗的文件经过分类以后,依据文件构成特点,将具有某方面共同点和联系密切的文件组合在一起,立成一个或几个案卷,以便保持文件之间的历史联系。我们一般采用按问题、作者、名称、地区、时间、收发文机关等“六个特征”立卷。而按问题立卷则是最常用的、最基本的方法,以便适应利用者按问题查找档案的需要。而《分类法》的类目正是按照国家活动的职能即按问题设置的。文件又是在国家活动中形成的,因此用《分类法》立卷不但可行,而且更能反映文件之间的历史联系和上下之间的从属关系,若将同类案卷排在一起,更便于档案的提供利用。
The article by the author, Qin Zhong, refers to the fact that the test (Xi’an Municipal Bureau of Civil Affairs) of adopting the category system of “China Archives Classification” (hereinafter referred to as “classification”) proved that it is not only feasible but also simple . The traditional method of creating a volume: after classifying a document of the Fonds, according to the features of the documents, combining documents that have something in common and closely connected with each other, forming one or more dossiers in order to keep the documents Historical contact. We generally use the “six characteristics” of the problem, the author, the name, region, time, sending and receiving organs and other legislation. The problem according to legislation is the most commonly used, the most basic method to meet the needs of users to find the file by question. The category of “taxonomy” is precisely set according to the functions of the state activities. Documents are formed in the national activities. Therefore, it is not only feasible to set up a volume with the “classification method”, but also to reflect the historical linkages between the documents and the subordinate relations between them. If the same type of files are arranged together, The availability of.