论文部分内容阅读
目的比较区域切除术与传统手术治疗腮腺良性肿瘤的疗效。方法选择我院口腔科近年来收治住院的95例腮腺良性肿瘤患者,所有患者均行择期手术治疗,根据术式不同将患者分为观察组与对照组,其中观察组42例患者,对照组53例患者,观察组患者行腮腺区域切除术,对照组患者行传统腮腺浅叶切除术,术后对患者进行随访,比较临床疗效。结果观察组患者手术时间少于对照组患者(P<0.05),切口长度小于对照组患者(P<0.05),术后并发症发生率低于对照组患者(P<0.05),两组患者术后复发率均较低。结论区域切除术治疗腮腺良性肿瘤的疗效优于传统腮腺浅叶切除术,该术式切口小,美观性好,术后并发症少,复发率低,可在临床推广应用。
Objective To compare the efficacy of regional resection and conventional surgery in the treatment of benign parotid gland tumors. Methods 95 cases of benign tumors of the parotid gland were treated in our hospital’s department of stomatology in recent years. All patients were undergoing elective surgical treatment. Patients were divided into the observation group and the control group according to different surgical methods. Among them, 42 patients in the observation group and 53 in the control group. Patients in the observation group and the observation group underwent parotidectomy. Patients in the control group underwent conventional parotid superficial lobe resection. Patients were followed up after surgery to compare clinical efficacy. Results The operative time of the observation group was less than that of the control group (P<0.05). The length of the incision was smaller than that of the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications was lower than that of the control group (P<0.05). After the relapse rate is low. Conclusions Regional resection is superior to conventional parotid superficial lobe resection in the treatment of benign parotid gland tumors. The surgical incision has small incision, good aesthetics, less postoperative complications and low recurrence rate. It can be widely used in clinical practice.