论文部分内容阅读
我国古代自秦汉即有强盗犯罪的系统立法,但自唐律始有“窃盗发觉,弃财逃走,财主追捕,因相拒扞”而不构成强盗的专门规定,并为其后宋元明清所继承。明清立法和律学对于不构成强盗和以“罪人拒捕”论的根据和理由进行了充分的说明,并有具体案例的实际适用相印证。这种形态与我国现代刑法“转化的抢劫”构成具有可加类比的内容,古代“弃财拒捕”以及与此相关问题的研究,对于理解适用我国刑法关于“转化的抢劫”具有相当重要的启示作用。
Since the Qin and Han dynasties in ancient China, there was systematic legislation on bandit crimes, but since the beginning of the Tang Dynasty, there were “special rules for stealing and discard,” “ Inherited. The legislation and law of the Ming and Qing Dynasties have fully explained the grounds and reasons for not constituting a bandit and refusing to arrest the criminals, and have concrete evidences of actual application of specific cases. This form and our modern criminal law ”robbery of transformation “ constitute an addictive content, the ancient ”abandoned fiscal arrest “ and the research related to this issue, to understand the application of our criminal law ”Has a very important revelation.