文献中对于分类词(也称个体量词)与其他量词的区分缺少明确的标准,许多学者甚至不加以区分。本文的目的有二:一是以数学中乘法的概念将分类词与量词精准地区分开来;二是将区分分类词的标准实际应用于中国台湾华语(也就是中国台湾的普通话,也叫作国语),将实际区分出的分类词表列出来。在分类词与量词的区分上,我们论证两者在句法上同属一个词类,但在语义上分属两个次类,并且重申Greenberg(1972)首先提出的分类词是“乘1”的数学概念,以及何万顺(Her2012)所延伸出的完整解释:在[数词X名词]的短语中,数词与X形成乘法的关系,即[数词XX];若X=1,则X为分类词;否则X为量词。在此基础上,我们仔细检视了前人所列举出中国台湾华语中的分类词,并且提出我们修正后的详细列表。我们希望本文可以作为区分其他语言分类词的模板。 In the literature, there is a lack of clear criteria for the distinction between classifiers (also called individual quantifiers) and other quantifiers, and many scholars do not even distinguish them. The purpose of this article is twofold: first, to classify the classified words and quantifiers precisely by the concept of multiplication in mathematics; secondly, to apply the criterion of distinguishing words to Mandarin Chinese in Taiwan, China (that is, Mandarin in Taiwan, China) ), Will be the actual classification of thesaurus listed. In terms of the distinction between classifiers and quantifiers, we argue that both of them are syntactically belong to one part of speech, but semantically belong to two sub-classes, and reiterate that the first proposed classification by Greenberg (1972) is “by 1 ” Mathematical concepts, and the complete explanation extended by He Wanshun (Her2012): In the phrase of [nouns X nouns], the relation between a numeral and a multiplication of X is [number XX]; if X = 1, then X is Category words; otherwise X is a quantifier. On this basis, we have carefully examined the taxonomic terms quoted by our predecessors in Mandarin Chinese, Taiwan, and proposed a detailed list of our amendments. We hope this article serves as a template for distinguishing other language terms.