论文部分内容阅读
高中语文第三册《谋攻》一文的中心论点是什么?北京海淀区教师进修学校编的《辅导与练习》答案是:“本文的中心论点就是题目‘谋攻’”.我认为这个答案不妥.论点应是一个判断,用判断句来表达.而“谋攻”仅是一个词组,词组一般只能表达概念.同时,答案还把文章的标题、论题、论述中心与中心论点混淆了.议论文的标题、论题、论述中心、论点、中心论点和分论点的含义和它们之间的关系如下所示:
What is the central argument of the article “Mission of Assault” in High School Chinese Book 3? The answer to “Guiding and Practice” compiled by the Teacher Training School in Haidian District of Beijing is: “The central argument in this article is the topic ’Attack’”. I don’t think this answer is correct. The argument should be a judgment, expressed in terms of judgment sentences. “Mission” is only a phrase, and phrases can generally only express concepts. At the same time, the answer also confuses the title, thesis, discourse center and central argument of the article. The meanings of the titles, topics, discourse centers, arguments, central arguments, and arguments of the argumentative thesis and their relationship are as follows: