论文部分内容阅读
案情简介: 原告:农业银行A市支行甲办事处。 被告:A市乙公司。 被告:A市丙公司 第三人:A市丁公司。 原告甲办事处于1995年6月21日以乙公司和丙公司为共同被告提起诉讼,称:乙公司于1994年10月8日向甲办事外借款100万元,用于购煤业务,并由丙公司担保。但借款期限届满后,乙公司仅归还本金1万元,支付利息1.5万元。以后虽经多次催收,但乙公司和丙公司均未履行约定的义务。请求判令乙公司立即偿付所欠的本息,并判令丙公司承担连带清偿责任。乙公司辩称:向甲办事处借款100万元,是应甲办事处的请求,调度给丁公司归还逾期贷款的,后来,甲办事处未履行替丁公司调度100万元给本公司还贷的诺言,属故意转嫁贷款风险的欺诈行为,请求判决驳回甲办事处的诉讼请求。丙公司
Brief introduction of the case: Plaintiff: A Branch of Agricultural Bank of China branch office. Defendant: A City B Company. Defendant: A City C company third person: A City Ding company. On June 21, 1995, Plaintiff A office filed a lawsuit with Company B and Company C as the joint defendants, claiming that Company B made a loan of 1 million yuan from the office for the purchase of coal on October 8, 1994, Company guarantee. However, after the expiration of the loan period, Company B will only return the principal amount of 10,000 yuan and pay interest of 15,000 yuan. After several times after the collection, but the company B and C did not fulfill the agreed obligations. Request Company B to immediately pay the principal and interest owed, and ordered Company C to assume joint and several liability. Company B argued that: A loan to the Office of 1000000 yuan, is the request of an office, scheduling the return of overdue loans to the company, and later, a office for the company did not fulfill Ding scheduling 1 million yuan repayment to the Company Of the promise, is deliberately pass the risk of fraudulent loans, request a decision to dismiss Office A’s claim. C company