关于俄国哲学的特色和特点问题已提出一个多世纪了.从上世纪40年代起,当俄国哲学家们开始研究俄国哲学思想的时候,就立即提出这样一个问题;能否说存在着作为独特现象的俄国哲学,更确切地说存在俄国的哲学.就是说.在俄国有哲学思想,但其根据源不在俄国,而在国外,这些哲学思想仅仅是在俄国传播,而非植根于此.在最早研究俄国哲学史的一部专著中,修士大司祭加夫里尔(B.H.沃斯克列辛斯基)就把哲学的性质、哲学的民族特点解释为民族性、民族的心理和经济特点,同时认为这些特点不仅是上帝赐予某一民族的,而且是地理条件造成的.在整个19世纪和20世纪上半期,几乎所有俄国哲学史家都这样或那样地论及俄国哲学的特色问题,或者完全否定这种特色,或者提出各自的论据.例如,车尔尼雪夫斯基在1856年写道:“从我们思想运动的代表人的独立地批判黑格尔体系之日起,这 The issue of the characteristics and characteristics of Russian philosophy has been raised for more than a century.From the 1940s onwards, when Russian philosophers began to study Russian philosophical thinking, they immediately raised the question of whether there was a unique phenomenon Russian philosophy, or rather Russian philosophy, that is to say that there is a philosophical thought in Russia, but its source is not in Russia, and abroad, these philosophical ideas are only spread in Russia, not rooted in it. In a monograph on the history of Russian philosophy, monk priest Gabriel Lars (BH Voskresensky) interpreted the nature of philosophy and the national characteristics of philosophy as the national and national psychological and economic characteristics, meanwhile, These characteristics are not only due to God’s grant to a nation but also to geographical conditions.Almost all Russian philosophical historians have dealt with characteristic issues of Russian philosophy in such or the first half of the 19th and 20th centuries, or have totally denied this For example, Chernyshevsky wrote in 1856: "The independent critique of Hegel from the representatives of our ideological movement Japanese date, this