论文部分内容阅读
行政法上的违反义务能否成为民事审理中认定欺诈的依据,以行政处罚中虚假宣传为基准,从虚假宣传行为认定的构成,到认定欺诈并施以惩罚性赔偿已成为打击虚假宣传行为的重要手段,我国法律并未定义虚假宣传,实务上认为虚假宣传意味着宣传的内容并非真实,意图使信息接受者在虚假宣传中错误理解认定为诈骗,以《民通意见》第68条为依据;在行政处罚决定仅具有证据效力的情形下,认定虚假宣传行为是可以作为民法上欺诈是可行的。
Whether the breach of obligation in administrative law can become the basis for the determination of fraud in the civil trial, based on the false propaganda in administrative punishment, from the constitution of the false propaganda act to the determination of fraud and the punitive damages have become the targets of cracking down on false propaganda Important means, our law does not define false propaganda, in practice that the false propaganda means that the contents of the propaganda is not true, the intention of the recipient of information in false propaganda misinterpretation identified as a fraud, “Opinions” Article 68 as the basis ; In the case of an administrative punishment decision that has only the effect of evidence, it is feasible to conclude that false propaganda acts as a fraud in civil law.