论文部分内容阅读
在用云梦秦简研究秦国社会状况的论著中,对隶臣妾的性质,至今意见分歧仍然很大。概括起来,主要有三种看法:隶臣妾是官奴隶;隶臣妾是因犯罪而被判处的刑徒;隶臣妾形式上是刑徒,实质上是奴隶。由是观之,争论的焦点在于隶臣妾究竟是奴隶还是刑徒。何者为是,未成定论,尚需继续研究。笔者认为,在讨论隶臣妾身份之前,必须仔细研读秦简,并结合其它文献材料,弄清它与臣妾、人臣妾之间的区别,才能对其身份做出正确判断。
In the treatise on the social conditions of Qin State studied by Qin and bamboo slips of Yunmeng, the differences of opinions to date between the concubines and the concubines are still very large. To summarize, there are mainly three kinds of views: the subordinate concubine is the official slave; the subordinate concubine is the criminal convicted of committing crimes; the subordinate concubine is formally a criminal and is essentially a slave. From the point of view, the debate is whether the slave concubine is a slave or a criminal. If yes, not a conclusion, still need to continue to study. The author believes that before discussing the status of subordinate concubine, we must carefully study Qin Jian, combined with other documents and materials to find out the difference between it and the concubine, concubine, in order to make a correct judgment of their identity.