跨越“卡夫丁峡谷”设想与东方社会主义并无联系

来源 :中国人民大学学报 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:alex_tan01
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
时下对跨越“卡夫丁峡谷”的设想存在着一些误解。“设想”的核心在于强调西欧革命与俄国革命的“互相补充”,这仍属于马、恩一贯主张的世界革命理论;现实中的东方社会主义则是按照“一国社会主义”的方式发展的。因此,东方社会主义同“设想”并无直接联系。论证东方社会主义的历史必然性,应以唯物史观为方法,而不能以改变马克思原意为基础。 Nowadays there are some misunderstandings about the idea of ​​crossing the “Cafudin Canyon.” The core of “vision” is to emphasize the “complementarity” between the revolutions in Western Europe and the Russian revolution. This still belongs to the revolutionary world theory that Ma and Tien have always advocated. In reality, Eastern socialism develops in the manner of “one-nation socialism.” . Therefore, Eastern socialism has no direct connection with “imagination.” The historical inevitability of demonstrating the socialism in the East should be based on the materialist concept of history and not on the basis of changing Marxist original intention.
其他文献