论文部分内容阅读
目的:对疤痕子宫再次妊娠的分娩方式进行探讨与研究。方法:选取本院2008年1月至2010年12月期间疤痕子宫再次妊娠的243例产妇的临床资料进行回顾分析,按分娩方式不同分为再次剖宫产组159例以及阴道分娩组84例。结果:再次剖宫产组和阴道分娩组在新生儿体重、Apgar评分方面比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。阴道分娩组产妇出血量、平均住院时间小于再次剖宫产组,生产时间长于再次剖宫产组,两组比较差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:疤痕子宫再次妊娠分娩方式的选择,应根据产妇具体情况,从多方面综合评估分析。
Objective: To investigate the ways of delivery of scar pregnancy again. Methods: The clinical data of 243 pregnant women with scar uterine re-pregnancy from January 2008 to December 2010 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the mode of delivery, 159 cases were re-cesarean section and 84 cases were vaginal delivery group. Results: The cesarean section group and vaginal delivery group had no significant difference in neonatal weight and Apgar score (P> 0.05). Vaginal delivery group maternal blood loss, the average length of stay in hospital was less than the second cesarean section, production longer than the second cesarean section, the difference between the two groups were statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion: The choice of scar pregnancy uterine pregnancy again mode of delivery, should be based on the specific circumstances of maternal, from a comprehensive assessment of many aspects.