“市场扰乱”是特别保障措施的启动条件,它的认定标准不同于一般保障条款,由于《中国入世议定书》中对“市场扰乱”的规定过于模糊,导致美国及许多国家宽泛的解释“市场扰乱”的认定标准,滥用特保措施。对此我们应坚持严格的解释原则,借鉴中美轮胎特保案中的裁定意见,更大保护我国的利益。 “Market disruption ” is the starting condition for the special safeguard measures. The standard of recognition is different from the general safeguard clause. Since the provisions of “market disruption ” in the “Protocol of Accession to the PRC” are too vague, the United States and many other countries have a broad Explain “market disruption ” of the accreditation standards, abuse of special safeguard measures. In this regard, we should uphold the principle of strict interpretation, draw lessons from the ruling opinions of the Sino-U.S.S tire special safeguard case, and further protect our interests.