论文部分内容阅读
各类社会风险“变现”的现实危险和实际损害,许多情况下都落到公民个人身上,直接威胁公民的人身和财产安全,而政府救助至少要在十分钟之后到达,这凸显了公民救助的重要性和必要性。同时,公民救助的巨大风险远远超出了道德的调整能力,呼唤法律对其进行有效保护。面对公民救助法律保护的我国现有制度和欧美不同模式,我们应在分清利弊、借鉴经验的基础上,结合道德发展和社会保障水平,选择“第三种模式”来规制公民救助。国家层面不必制定见义勇为保障法,而应制定调整范围更大的公民救助保护法。
The real dangers and actual harms of various types of social risks and “liquidations”, which in many cases fall on individual citizens, directly threaten the personal and property security of citizens, and government aid arrives at least ten minutes later, highlighting the fact that citizens The importance and necessity of aid. At the same time, the great risk of civic aid goes far beyond the capacity of moral adjustment and calls for effective protection of the law. Faced with the existing system of our country’s protection of law and the different modes of European and American protection, we should, on the basis of distinguishing the pros and cons and drawing lessons from our experience, combine the moral development with the level of social security and choose the “third mode” to regulate civil assistance. Instead of formulating a law of courage for the protection of the courageous at the national level, a civil rescuing and protection law with a wider scope of adjustment should be formulated.