自认,作为民事诉讼证据制度中一项基本制度,具有“证据之王”之美誉,然而,在我国, 虽有三个司法解释(见下文)涉及自认,但仍极为滞后,无法涵盖自认制度丰富的内涵,严重束缚了我国证据理论研究和司法实践。因而说,重视自认制度的研究和探析,具有重要意义。本文就自认制度基本理论、自认制度在我国的运行状况及自认制度之完善,作简略的探讨,冀以拋砖引玉。 However, in our country, although three judicial interpretations (see below) involve self-identification, they are still extremely lagging behind and can not be covered by this system The connotation of self-identification system has seriously hampered evidence theory research and judicial practice in our country. Therefore, it is of great significance to pay attention to the research and analysis of self-admitting system. This article briefly discusses the basic theory of self-admitting system, the self-admitting system in our country and the perfection of self-admitting system.