论文部分内容阅读
遥远么?近百年来中西音乐交流过程中反复出现的关于“民族性”问题的争论与纠缠仍在耳畔。从文化人类学的角度来说,不存在一个纯粹抽象的中华民族。我们可观察的实际上是一个由多民族、多中心、多支点形成的多源交融的中华民族的历史与文化。因此,评价什么是“中国的”音乐作品或作品体现了“民族性”与否,其标准显然带有抽象性与虚拟性。其内容可视不同的“时空背景”而变换。比如通过“救亡”与“斗争”的
How far away? The controversy and entanglement on the issue of “nationality” recurring in the process of exchange of Chinese and Western music in the past century have still come. From a cultural anthropological point of view, there is not a purely abstract Chinese nation. What we can observe is actually the history and culture of a multi-sourced Chinese nation formed by a multi-ethnic, multi-center and multi-fulcrum. Therefore, the evaluation of what is “Chinese” music works or works reflects the “nationality” or not, the standard is clearly abstracted and virtual. Its content can be different depending on the “space-time background” and change. For example, through the “salvation” and “struggle.”