论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨影响个体运动病的生理、心理因素。方法实验前运用艾森克人格问卷(EPQ)、卡特尔16项人格因素问卷(16PF)、特质应对方式问卷(TCSQ)、防御方式问卷(DSQ)及一般情况调查表对学员进行调查和观察;运用平衡秋千实验观察学员的运动病反应程度。结果无反应组和有反应组人格量表内外向分量表得分差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),无反应组和有反应组人格量表的神经质分量表(情绪的稳定与不稳定)得分差异接近有统计学意义(P=0.05),学员的一般状况及某些生理因素与其运动病程度之间进行Kendall’s Tau-b相关检验,结果有统计学意义(P<0.05或P<0.01)。结论人格、自我心理感受及某些生理因素影响学员的运动病反应程度,对运动病的预测、预防可以从这些方面着手。
Objective To explore the physiological and psychological factors that affect individual motion sickness. Methods Before the experiment, participants were investigated and observed by EPQ, 16 Cartel QFQ, TCSQ, DSQ and general situation questionnaire. The equilibrium swing experiment was used to observe the students’ motion sickness reaction. Results There was significant difference between the scores of extroversion and extroversion in the non-reaction group and the response group (P <0.05), the score of neuroticism (emotional stability and instability) in the non-reaction group and the reaction group personality scale The difference was close to statistical significance (P = 0.05). The Kendall’s Tau-b correlation test was used between the general condition of the students and some physiological factors and the degree of motion sickness. The results were statistically significant (P <0.05 or P <0.01). Conclusions Personality, self-psychological feelings and some physiological factors affect the students’ degree of motion sickness reaction. Prediction and prevention of motion sickness can start from these aspects.