论文部分内容阅读
本文就马略是“古罗马民主派政治家”这一论断持否定态度。马略在其早年是一位缘权贵的依附者;叛主之后,他几度出任罗马执政官,乃是北非朱古达战争和意大利北方战争所造就。在改革上,仅局限于军事,而无整体的全方位的政治建树。在萨尔宁事件上,暴露出他是一个两面派,最终例向了元老贵族。他挑起了与苏拉的争斗,给罗马人民带来深重的灾难。马略不是民主派政治家,更谈不上他是民主派的领袖;其形象是一个政治上无定见的朝秦暮楚的人物。
This article holds a negative attitude towards the assertion that Marceau is an “ancient Roman democrat politician.” In his early years, Magister was a dependency of a priest and nobleman; after the Rebels, he became Roman Archon for the most part but as a result of the Jugurtah War in North Africa and the Northern War in Italy. In the reform, it is confined to the military, without the overall overall political achievements. In the Saling News incident, he was exposed as a two-faced group, eventually leading to the elder aristocrats. He provoked a battle with Sura, bringing deep disaster to the Roman people. Major is not a democrat politician, much less he is the leader of the democrats; his image is a politically unfamiliar figure.