论文部分内容阅读
刑法条文自身的局限性与复杂社会现实之间的紧张关系决定了刑法解释的必要存在。在司法实践当中,针对“教唆不满14周岁人犯罪”这类案情,刑法并没有直接性的条文规定。实践当中往往适用《刑法》第29条第1款之规定。面对此景,我们应该追随在教义学的旗帜下,准确合理地把握刑法该条文的规范保护目的,进而对其进行刑法解释,将此类情形排除适用《刑法》第29条第1款的规定,并根据间接正犯的理论给予其正确的刑罚规制。
The tension between the limitations of criminal law itself and the complex social reality determines the necessary existence of criminal law interpretation. In judicial practice, the criminal law does not have the provisions of direct sex in the light of the cases of “abetting people under the age of 14 who commit crimes”. In practice, the provisions of article 29, paragraph 1, of the Criminal Code are often applied. In the face of this scene, we should follow the doctrine of the banner, accurately and reasonably grasp the purpose of the provisions of criminal law protection, and then its interpretation of the criminal law, such cases are excluded from the application of “Criminal Law” Article 29, paragraph 1 Regulations, and according to the theory of indirect offenders to give it the correct penalties.