论文部分内容阅读
目的 :探讨对急性胃炎患者进行有针对性护理的临床效果。方法 :选取我院在2014年2月至2015年11月期间接收的68例急性胃炎患者作为研究对象。按照随机方案将这68例患者分成有针对性护理组(34例)和普通护理组(34例)。在这两组患者接受治疗期间,对普通护理组患者进行普通护理,在此基础上,对有针对性护理组患者进行有针对性护理。护理结束后,对比两组患者的临床护理效果、HAMA(汉密尔顿焦虑量表)的评分和HAMD(汉密尔顿抑郁量表)的评分。结果:与普通护理组患者相比,有针对性护理组患者接受护理的有效率更高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在接受护理前,两组患者HAMA的评分和HAMD的评分相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。在护理结束后,与普通护理组患者相比,有针对性护理组患者HAMA的评分和HAMD的评分更低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 :对急性胃炎患者进行有针对性护理的临床效果显著,能够有效地缓解其负面情绪。
Objective: To investigate the clinical effect of targeted nursing in patients with acute gastritis. Methods: A total of 68 patients with acute gastritis received in our hospital from February 2014 to November 2015 were selected as the study subjects. According to the randomized scheme, the 68 patients were divided into the targeted care group (34 cases) and the general nursing group (34 cases). During the treatment of these two groups of patients, the common nursing group patients were treated as normal nursing, and on this basis, the targeted nursing group patients were given targeted care. After treatment, clinical care outcomes, HAMA (Hamilton Anxiety Scale) scores and HAMD (Hamilton Depression Rating) scores were compared between the two groups. Results: Compared with the general nursing group, the nursing of the targeted nursing group was more effective and the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Before receiving nursing care, there was no significant difference between HAMA score and HAMD score in both groups (P> 0.05). At the end of nursing care, HAMA scores and HAMD scores were lower in the targeted care group than in the general care group, with a statistically significant difference (P <0.05). Conclusion: The clinical effect of targeted nursing in patients with acute gastritis is significant, which can effectively alleviate the negative emotions.