论文部分内容阅读
尽管“反思”这个曾经盛行一时的字样,现在很少出现在有关图书馆学基础理论研究的文章中,而实际上,目前基础理论的研究领域中,除少数人还继续着艰苦的理论建设外,大多则又陷入“反思”之中。可以认为,这是继80年代初期、中期之后在基础理论研究领域中出现的第三次反思。在短短的10年中多次出现这种现象,其原因究竟如何?是传统的理论价值观发生危机时即会产生的理论动荡,还是理论研究本身脱离了科学的轨道?如果我们站在科学
Although the once popular reverberation has rarely appeared in articles on the basic theoretical research of library science, in fact, in the current research fields of basic theory, in addition to the few who continue the arduous theoretical construction , Most of them fall into “reflection”. It can be considered as the third introspection in the field of basic theoretical research since the mid-1980s and later. How many times has this phenomenon appeared in a short span of 10 years? Is it the theoretical turbulence that arises in the event of the crisis of the traditional theoretical values or is the theoretical research itself detached from the scientific track? If we stand in the science